In 2020, a study, led by Carolin Scholz and published in Ecology and Evolution, explored the dietary habits of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) in both urban and rural environments, using stable isotope analysis to identify differences between individual foxes and their habitats.
Key Findings:
Generalist Predator with Narrow Individual Specialization:
Although red foxes are generalist omnivores, meaning they can eat a wide variety of plants and animals, the study revealed that individual foxes tend to specialize in narrower diets.
The population of rural foxes displayed a broader range of dietary items, consuming a diverse array of plants, mollusks, insects, and larger prey. However, each rural fox exhibited an individual preference for a specific type of food within this broad spectrum.
Urban vs. Rural Fox Diets:
Urban foxes: The diet of urban foxes was less varied overall compared to their rural counterparts. Most urban foxes relied heavily on human-provided food sources, which could be identified by elevated levels of δ13C, a carbon isotope marker commonly found in processed or discarded human food. Urban foxes exhibited less dietary diversity, suggesting that they benefit from the abundance of food waste, pet food, and compost readily available in city environments.
Rural foxes: Foxes in rural areas had a much more varied diet, feeding on a wider range of natural food sources. However, each individual rural fox still exhibited a form of dietary specialization, preferring certain types of food within this broad range.
Specialization and Flexibility:
The study highlighted an important aspect of the red fox's adaptability: the combination of both individual dietary specialization and population-level flexibility. While urban foxes might appear to have limited options due to their dependence on human waste, the food abundance allows them to thrive, even with a more restricted diet.
The results suggest that urban foxes do not need to compete as much for food, as human waste provides ample resources for them. On the other hand, rural foxes must rely on a more diverse and unpredictable range of food sources, yet each individual tends to focus on specific food types, avoiding direct competition with other rural foxes.
Conclusion:
This research reveals that red foxes' success in urban environments can be attributed to their ability to exploit human-provided food sources. Urban foxes exhibit less dietary variation both as individuals and as a population, while rural foxes display more variety in their diets, although each individual tends to specialize in specific food items. This combination of adaptability at the population level and specialization at the individual level is key to the red fox's survival in diverse environments.
Broader Implications:
The study suggests that human activity directly influences the dietary patterns of urban wildlife, reinforcing the need for understanding the ecological impacts of urbanization on species like the red fox. By successfully adapting their diets to human environments, red foxes demonstrate how generalist species can thrive in cities, but the implications of this shift for long-term urban biodiversity remain an open question.
Sources:
