In recent years, the potential environmental impact of parasiticides—common treatments used to protect pets from fleas, ticks, and worms—has come under increasing scrutiny. While these treatments play an essential role in preventing infestations that cause discomfort or spread disease among pets, the residual chemicals they leave behind may have unintended and far-reaching effects on ecosystems, including rivers and other water habitats. New research is prompting veterinary professionals, pet owners, and environmental advocates to explore safer, more targeted approaches that protect both pet health and the environment.
Veterinary Residues in Foxes: A Growing Concern
A recent study has detected the presence of closantel, an anti-worm drug commonly used by farmers on livestock, in Scottish red foxes (Vulpes vulpes). This discovery raises concerns about the contamination of wildlife and the potential for parasites to develop drug resistance, which could have significant environmental and ecological consequences.
The study, published as part of Issue 608, highlights the risk of red foxes ingesting closantel through various environmental routes. The drug, used as a deworming agent in livestock, was found in 18 out of 118 fox liver samples collected between 2014 and 2019. Concentrations of the drug in these samples ranged from 6.5 micrograms per kilogram (µgkg−1) to 1,383 µgkg−1, with most readings falling between 20 and 100 µgkg−1.
The researchers suggest that foxes are likely being exposed to closantel by consuming treated livestock, faeces from herbivores given the drug, or contaminated rodents and water. While the immediate impact on the foxes themselves is unclear, the study raises the concern that low-level exposure to such veterinary drugs could lead to the development of drug-resistant parasites in wildlife.
Environmental Contamination and Drug Resistance
Veterinary residues in the environment pose a significant threat to wildlife. While birds of prey have traditionally been used to monitor environmental contamination, the researchers in this study argue that foxes could serve as valuable sentinel species. Red foxes, with their varied diet and widespread presence across diverse habitats, are frequently exposed to a range of environmental pollutants. Additionally, because foxes are often culled for pest control, their carcasses are more readily available for sampling.
This study’s findings add to growing concerns about the contamination of the environment by veterinary drugs. The European Commission has already identified pharmaceutical residues in water and soil as an emerging environmental issue. Moreover, the UN’s Strategic Approach to International Chemical Management (SAICM) acknowledges the deep interconnectedness of animal, environmental, and human health, endorsing a "One Health" strategy that calls for greater attention to these global health challenges.
Monitoring for Veterinary Drug Residues
Monitoring wildlife for the presence of veterinary drugs such as closantel is crucial for understanding contamination pathways and mitigating their impacts. While foxes may benefit in the short term from ingesting drugs that help to treat parasites, prolonged or low-level exposure to these substances could have the unintended consequence of fostering drug-resistant parasites. Although parasite resistance to closantel is not yet widely documented, it has been recorded in some cases of Barber’s pole worm (Haemonchus contortus) and liver fluke (Fasciola hepatica).
The study’s authors recommend further investigation into the contamination pathways of closantel, as well as its broader effects on wildlife and ecosystems. They also suggest that foxes could play a critical role in future monitoring efforts to assess the risk posed by veterinary drugs to both wildlife and the environment.
A Call for Responsible Action
This study highlights the pressing issue of veterinary residues in the environment and the potential dangers they pose to wildlife. As top predators, foxes are particularly vulnerable to environmental pollutants, and their contamination with closantel—a veterinary anti-worm drug—underscores the broader problem of pharmaceutical pollution.
The Environmental Impact of Veterinary Drugs is becoming an increasingly concerning issue. As noted by veterinary surgeon Dr. Peter Caldwell and echoed in various studies, dewormers and other treatments can unintentionally harm ecosystems, affecting everything from green spaces to water sources. In the case of foxes, exposure to closantel raises alarms not only about the health of these animals but also about the wider risk of parasites developing drug resistance. The study suggests that monitoring red foxes and other wildlife for residues could be a key tool in understanding and addressing this emerging environmental threat.
The Impact on Wildlife and Ecosystems: Both Castro’s discussion of flea treatments and this study on foxes emphasize the profound effects veterinary drugs can have on non-target species. While Castro warns of damage to invertebrates, which disrupts food chains involving fish and birds, the fox study focuses on the direct ingestion of closantel by foxes and its potential to drive drug-resistant parasites. In both cases, the unintended consequences are clear: widespread environmental contamination with pharmaceuticals is endangering animal populations and ecosystems.
The Role of Biodiversity in Mitigation: Planting for diversity plays an essential role in countering environmental contamination. Diverse plant species can help decontaminate soils by breaking down pollutants, improving soil health, and filtering harmful substances. Additionally, this diversity provides critical habitats and natural food sources for wildlife, including foxes and their prey. By promoting a range of plant life, not only does the quality of the soil improve, but foxes may also have access to medicinal plants that aid in their self-care. Many animals instinctively use certain plants to treat ailments, and a varied ecosystem can offer foxes access to plants that help manage internal parasites or other health issues. Furthermore, supporting biodiversity also strengthens prey populations, creating a more balanced ecosystem that ultimately reduces foxes' reliance on scavenging from contaminated livestock sources.
The Need for Responsible Use: Veterinarians and wildlife caregivers have a critical role to play in mitigating these risks. Castro advocates for cautious, targeted use of dewormers and flea treatments, suggesting alternative approaches such as worm egg counts and seasonal adjustments to reduce the environmental footprint of veterinary medicines. Similarly, the fox study serves as an implicit caution to those who interact with wildlife, urging more careful consideration of how the drugs used on domestic and farm animals may end up impacting wild species.
Broader Environmental Consequences: Pharmaceutical residues are increasingly recognised as a global environmental issue. Both the European Commission and the UN’s Strategic Approach to International Chemical Management (SAICM) have acknowledged the need to address the pollution of water, soil, and wildlife habitats by veterinary drugs. By continuing to monitor wildlife like foxes, we can gain vital insights into the routes of contamination and take proactive measures to protect not only animals but entire ecosystems.
Polluted Rivers and Pet Parasite Treatments
Recent research has highlighted significant contamination of surface Recent research has highlighted significant contamination of surface waters, such as rivers and lakes, with fipronil and imidacloprid. One study in the UK detected fipronil in 99% of river samples, while imidacloprid was present in 66% of samples. This contamination poses a severe threat to aquatic insects like dragonflies and mayflies. These findings suggest that the widespread use of pet parasiticides could be a significant source of pollution in UK rivers, particularly as these chemicals have been banned in agricultural applications since 2018.
Research on parasite prevalence and the environmental impact of parasiticides suggests that a more selective approach to treatment may be beneficial. Fleas are found in 5% of cats and 2% of dogs in the UK, while ticks are present in only 0.7% of dogs, indicating that infestations are less common than previously thought. Young animals (under 12 months) and cats have a higher likelihood of infestations, making them primary candidates for targeted treatment.
From an environmental perspective, parasiticide chemicals can persist and contaminate water sources; for instance, fipronil, a common parasiticide, can still be detected in rinse water up to 28 days after application. To reduce environmental runoff, spot-on treatments generally advise against allowing animals to swim or be exposed to rain for at least 48 hours post-application.
Safer Alternatives for Supporting Fox Health
Supporting the health of wild foxes goes beyond reducing chemical treatments; it includes creating a clean, supportive environment with natural deterrents and carefully managing feeding practices. Maintaining a healthy habitat with native, immune-boosting plants and adopting cautious feeding habits can help minimise the need for parasiticides while supporting overall fox well-being.
A clean, well-maintained habitat can significantly contribute to the health and safety of foxes by minimising pests and disease risks:
Shelter and Feeding Stations: Keep any shelters or feeding stations clean and clear of food waste, as unhygienic areas can attract parasites and other predators. Regularly disinfect and maintain these areas to reduce the risk of pest infestations and disease spread.
Irregular Feeding Times: Avoid feeding foxes large amounts and at consistent times. Parasites, predators, and other opportunistic animals can quickly learn a routine, increasing the risk of foxes being targeted. By varying feeding times, you reduce the likelihood of unwanted guests associating the area with predictable meals.
Garden and Habitat Cleanliness: Keeping the area free of decaying matter and waste discourages parasites and other harmful organisms from settling in fox habitats. A healthy environment promotes well-being and discourages pest populations from establishing nearby.
Planting certain species and avoiding the use of any chemical on your garden, you can naturally boost fox immunity and deter pests:
Herbs that Repel Parasites: Aromatic herbs like lavender, mint, and rosemary help to repel parasites. These can be planted around fox habitats to create a pest-resistant zone that doesn’t rely on chemicals.
Native Immune-Boosting Berries: Berry bushes like elderberry and hawthorn are nutritious and help support foxes’ immune systems. These plants also attract pollinators, which contribute to the local ecosystem.
Pollinator-Friendly Wildflowers: Wildflowers such as yarrow and calendula attract beneficial insects that naturally control pests, creating a balanced environment that benefits foxes and other wildlife.
Pest-Resistant Native Vegetation: Incorporate hardy native shrubs and grasses to reduce potential pest nesting spots. A diversity of plants helps create a balanced ecosystem that naturally regulates pest populations.
Limiting chemical treatments to higher-risk seasons, such as warmer months when parasites are more active, can help protect foxes without unnecessary exposure to toxic substances. By combining irregular feeding times, supportive plant choices, and a clean, varied habitat, fox carers can help reduce reliance on parasiticides while promoting a healthier, safer environment for foxes to thrive.
Recommendations for Wildlife Rescuers
To protect both the foxes in your care and the surrounding environment, consider the following guidelines for the safe and minimal use of parasiticides:
Apply Treatments Correctly: Only use medication prescribed for the animal by a veterinary professional. Always follow the manufacturer’s instructions carefully when applying any parasiticide treatment to avoid overexposure.
Limit Water Exposure: Most spot-on treatments advise keeping treated animals out of water for at least 48 hours post-application, though the chemicals can persist longer. To prevent contamination of natural water sources, it’s best to keep treated foxes out of wet weather for as long as possible after application.
Maintain Clean Environments: Regular washing of fox beds, bowls and enrichment and frequent habitat cleaning can significantly reduce the need for chemical flea and parasite treatments. These hygiene practices can help maintain a cleaner, healthier environment and lessen the likelihood of pest buildup.
Assess Each Fox’s Individual Risk: Evaluate specific risk factors for each fox when considering parasiticide treatments. In-situ target training can facilitate low-stress treatment application, allowing rehabbers to apply medication only to foxes that truly need it. Consulting with a veterinarian experienced in wildlife care can further help wildlife rehabbers develop a minimal and effective treatment plan tailored to each fox’s health needs and environmental conditions.
By using parasiticides thoughtfully and only as needed, rescuers can protect both the foxes they care for and the broader ecosystem from chemical exposure.
Summary
For those who care for or feed foxes, understanding the risks posed by exposure to certain veterinary treatments is essential. Red foxes play a crucial role in maintaining ecosystem balance, and protecting them from environmental contamination is a shared responsibility. Actively monitoring the use of veterinary medicines and supporting biodiversity through diverse planting can help mitigate the risks of drug-resistant parasites, supporting the health of wildlife and their habitats.
Parasiticides, commonly used to protect pets from fleas, ticks, and worms, are now raising environmental concerns. Research shows that chemicals like fipronil and imidacloprid, often found in pet treatments, can contaminate rivers and harm aquatic ecosystems. These chemicals linger in the environment and threaten non-target species vital to biodiversity, such as bees and insects. Wildlife carers are encouraged to use parasiticides sparingly, only when necessary, and to maintain clean, natural habitats that reduce reliance on chemicals. Through responsible use and sustainable practices, we can protect both animal health and the environment.
Sources:
